Are We Real?

Are We Real link.

Cosmological Constant-Not Luck. Scientists see and know our universe must have been designed. But they will not accept belief in God, I.D. So scientists are suppressing their knowledge due to their hatred toward God, especially Jesus Christ.

Scientists now 'believe' there are infinite amounts of universes aka multiverses so that the anthropic principle which they DO admit exists in light of the Cosmological Constant.

This means scientists' direction toward the Multiverse Theory was originally caused by a knowledge of God's fine-tuning.

As they proceed to do their math in order to learn more about the nature of these other universes, scientists were brought back to the notion of a creator.

There is no access to these other universes. No proof.  However, they DID find 2 'proofs' of an intelligent designer. But instead, they prefer to lie, and trying to cover up the truth, it- the lie- multiplies . Like when you cut the head of a hydra, it grows more heads than before.

The brain specialists going with the evolution approach are convinced the human brain cannot advance any further. Our intelligence has reached its potential. Funny, they did  not discuss hyperbaric chambers. They do not discuss savants. We will advance our capabilities through technology. 

"Our universe may be a hologram created by a super advanced race in another universe, making us created beings", like the Bible plainly says (I mean the 'created beings' part). Here again these guys are led to God, however they need to splinter off and from the most logical and most immediate answer: ONE GOD/ ONE UNIVERSE to what they prefer: NO GOD/ MULTIVERSE/ GODS/ US.

At least 3 times science points to God and 3 times scientists are denying God. They search for an alternative to the Bible's God to find an "Intelligence" so like the God of the Bible. They refuse to admit it.       

The Majority, Minority

Unfortunately what really takes place under our noses is covered up or distorted by our media. Even in higher education the demeanor against inductive reasoning when addressing origin of life is synonymous to an intellectual  monopoly. If you DO submit materials even hinting at I.D. (intelligent Design) you are labeled as unfit to represent the very profession you worked hard for and earned, and I mean materials with sound reasoning and plausible arguments/evidence.

 So, when I read posts like this it sounds like  a challenge which can never be met since one side is holding the cards and owns the casino. (link)

The specialists are supposed to be taken for their word and to be peer reviewed, etc.  Then the scientific community can tweak and what- not till they get a theory fine tuned. Well, it is majority ruled by intellectual bullies (I cant believe I said that). The majority may be wrong on some finer issues and numbers are daunting the results; if we think this does not happen, we are fooling ourselves, or we are being fooled.

I have just recently discovered that the people calling the shots in certain fields like cosmology 'discovered' the Multiverse Theory because some of them distinctively found good evidence for a designed cosmos thru what is called the Cosmological Constant.  Mathematics showed the way to God, so to speak, and guess what? Well, since certain people did not want the religious smell of old candles in the lab, they needed to opt for an alternative, and vwallah: Muti-universes (infinite number of universes, some successful, some not so successful) now exist with ours to simply pop up to solve any supernatural issues.  This is not purely innocent by a long stretch of the word. The people listed below are not welcome in your college level science discussion groups (if you sympathize with their views). But none of them graduated from strictly religious institutions with a religious agenda, rather it was the opposite: from naturalism to supernaturalism which means from no intent to intent behind the scenes of the fabric of space/time and life itself-us included.  

Dr Dean Kenyon is a great example. He coauthored the book called Chemical Predestination used by I don't know how many universities. He was set in his career until he was shown a book by Dr Wilder Smith. Why did he not learn of that man in college, well, guess. He switched camps-and it must have been a painful process- as he was fired from his tenure position after going public with his more I.D./ creationist direction from his abiogenesis notions which he himself interpreted for the rest of the scientific community: talk about qualified specialist. (I would like to see Eugene Scott top this)

Although my writing is a little terse I wish not to be, as this topic is more significant than what it is made out to be.

Here are 6 individuals that are specialists in their respectable fields who have seen and demonstrated very credible cases for the very thing evolution believing atheists cannot stomach: the fingerprints of God. If you have heard of them 9 out of 10 times it was with derision. I myself took 2 classes at the university level in physical anthropology long before I came to the realization that I was not being shown stuff which I think people who are politically opposed to both I.D. and Creation theories holds back from us.

  

Dean Kenyon (link)

Michael Behe (link)

Wilder Smith (link)

Gary Parker (link) 

Richard Sternberg (link)

Guillermo  Gonzales (link)